Friends With Benefits Movie Vs. No Strings Attached Movie Differences Friends With Benefits vs. No Strings Attached: How to Tell Them Apart by Shannon Vestal 08/7/11 32 Reactions 0 Shares Print 0 0 0 0 0 Back in January, Ashton Kutcher and Natalie Portman starred in No Strings Attached as two friends who decide to sleep together without the messy involvement of a relationship. If the trailers for Justin Timberlake and Mila Kunis's Friends With Benefits is giving you major movie déjà vu, we're here to help. The titles and premises are already confusing, so I'm going to try to clear it up for you by making distinctions between the two films before Friends With Benefits hits theaters on July 22. Source: WireImage, Getty Supporting Casts What’s Your Reaction? 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Strings Attached: Chris Bridges (aka Ludacris), Lake Bell, Olivia Thirlby, and Greta Gerwig round out the NSA cast. Friends With Benefits: FWB boasts an ensemble cast including Emma Stone, Woody Harrelson, and Andy Samberg. Source: WireImage 1 / 5 Leading Ladies What’s Your Reaction? 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Strings Attached: Natalie Portman plays Emma, a doctor who's too busy to have a romantic relationship. Friends With Benefits: Mila Kunis (Portman's Black Swan costar) is Jamie, a young professional who sleeps with her male best friend. Source: WireImage, Getty 2 / 5 Leading Men What’s Your Reaction? 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Strings Attached: Ashton Kutcher stars as Adam, a single guy who starts to have feelings for his sex buddy Emma. Friends With Benefits: Justin Timberlake plays Dylan, who falls for his friend Jamie after they start sleeping together. Source: WireImage, Getty 3 / 5 Tone What’s Your Reaction? 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Strings Attached: Portman and Kutcher's story is a comedic take on the subject. Friends With Benefits: Kunis and Timberlake are going for R-rated raunchy comedy. Source: WENN.com 4 / 5 Release Date What’s Your Reaction? 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Strings Attached: Jan. 21, 2011 Friends With Benefits: July 22, 2011 Source: WENN.com 6 / 5 Friends With Benefits vs. No Strings Attached: How to Tell Them Apart originally posted on POPSUGAR Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 Back to Homepage Comments Read More MoviesFriends With BenefitsNo Strings AttachedBuzz SlideshowJustin TimberlakeAshton KutcherNatalie PortmanMila Kunis Ashton Kutcher Mila's Graphic Delivery-Room Talk Will Make You Laugh and Gross You Out 12/6 Holy Makeout! Ashton Gives Mom-to-Be Mila a Romantic Kiss 24/3 Mila Kunis and Ashton Kutcher Are Expecting 24/3 What Basketball Game? It's All About Ashton and Mila's Sweet Kiss 04/1 Alec Baldwin and Other Stars With Twitter Trouble 28/6/13 Mila, Michelle, James, and More Premiere Oz the Great and Powerful 14/2/13 Natalie Portman Yep, All These Stars Went to Ivy League Schools 28/5 Natalie and Benjamin Only Have Eyes For Each Other 13/11/13 Natalie and Jessica Master the Art of Looking Fabulous 09/11/13 Tom Hiddleston Is Having More Fun Than Anyone 08/11/13 By the Hammer of Thor! Natalie Portman's Best Promo Looks 08/11/13 Natalie Portman's Latest Outing Is A-Dior-able 07/11/13 Justin Timberlake 101 Justin Timberlake Moments You'll Never Forget 2 weeks ago The EGOT: Which Stars Are Almost There? 09/6 The New JT/MJ Video Is Basically the Best Michael Jackson Tribute 14/5 Justin Timberlake Reveals Why He Left *NSYNC 12/5 Can You Tell the Celebrity From the Wax Figure? 09/5 75 Unforgettable Met Gala Moments 05/5 Mila Kunis Mila's Graphic Delivery-Room Talk Will Make You Laugh and Gross You Out 12/6 Mila Leaves Ashton at Home to Bring Her Baby Bump to the Red Carpet 10/6 Here's Why Mila Kunis Wants a "Natural Birth" 09/5 These Celebrity Look-Alikes Will Blow Your Mind 20/4 Mila Kunis Makes a Glowing MTV Movie Awards Appearance 14/4 Mila Kunis Takes Her Bump and Bling to CinemaCon 28/3 What’s Your Reaction? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reactions laug89 2 years ive seen both movies, and i gotta say that friends with bennefits is better in every way, it is funnier, smarter, and the soundtrack is amazing on top of it, whereas no strings attached is just too cheesey and the characters just dont have as much chemistry. darcicomplex 3 years The TV spots and trailers have me really excited to see Friends With Benefits - the riffing between Justin Timberlake and Mila Kunis is reallly hilarious, although I hope they didn't just pull out all the funny parts for the ads... I especially liked the spot that had "Love In America" by JTX, I love the playful synth lines, hope I hear the song in the actual movie, too ( watch at http://vimeo.com/26184095 ) emilywhaaat 3 years It's funny why the directors decided to release these movies at almost the same time when they have more or less the same plot. If I were to choose, I think I'd pick out Ashton and Natalie. But I think that Friends With Benefits have more funny moments than No Strings Attached. I'm thinking of watching one of these movies with my long distance boyfriend (http://www.longdistancerelationshipsadvice.net). littlemunchkin 3 years #4 I agree - will be interesting to see the difference between how a female directs a film on this subject and a male. awesomepants 3 years Justin Timberlake ruins movies. He's not charming on screen and he's one of those people who has a big head because a couple of people told him he was funny. baileydancerr 3 years I love that its Ashton kutcher and Mila kunis from that's 70's show. baileydancerr 3 years I love that its Ashton kutcher and Mila kunis from that's 70's show. 3 years Mila kunis over postman any day. Friends is soooo much better- if you can't decide which one to watch 3 years i think it is so funny how Mila Kunis and Natalie Portman just came out in the same movie and now are coming out with their own movies about the same thing...there's gotta be some kinda of connection.... 3 years It will be interesting to see how both stories unfold as one is written by a a female "No Strings Attached" and "Friends with Benefits"s is written by a male. Same story line from each gender I think I will like No Strings better because the female will have the upper hand...I'm sure than men will like Friends better because the male will have the upper hand. indiegirl66 3 years Hi all-look, before Justin & Mila & Ashton & Natalie, the indie world did it first with a terrific young cast out of New York. FRIENDS (WITH BENEFITS) went on to win tons of awards at film festivals around the country. Check it out. Oh, and if you watch closely you'll catch the cameo of the hot young actress currently working on her dragon tattoo... http://www.babelgum.com/4024119/friends-with-benefits.html indiegirl66 3 years Hi all-look, before Justin & Mila & Ashton & Natalie, the indie world did it first with a terrific young cast out of New York. FRIENDS (WITH BENEFITS) went on to win tons of awards at film festivals around the country. Check it out. Oh, and if you watch closely you'll catch the cameo of the hot young actress currently working on her dragon tattoo...http://www.babelgum.com/4024119/friends-with-benefits.html lizlee89 3 years here's another distinction - one stupid; the others stupider (that's right; I said "stupider" - that's how stupid not only the concepts of both these movies are but, even worse, the concept of the identical concepts and releasing them at the same time). although I think "Friends with Benefits" actually looks like it could have some funny moments (maybe because I find Mila Kunis and Justin Timberlake much more likable that Natalie Portman and Ashton Kutcher)... Burkina 3 years There is something so off puting about Mila Kunis's eyes.