Skip Nav
What It's Like to Try a Sensory-Deprivation Flotation Tank
editor experiments
I Floated Away Back Pain and Stress in a Sensory-Deprivation Float Tank — and Loved It
Biggest Workout Mistakes, According to a Trainer
Trainer Tips
Even If You've Been Working Out For Years, You Could Still Be Making These Mistakes
Keto
Everything You Can Drink on the Keto Diet (Yes, It's More Than Just Water)
beachbody
I Traded CrossFit For 80 Day Obsession For 1 Week, and This Is What Happened
Can Coffee Boost Metabolism?
Weight Loss
What an Expert Wants You to Know About Drinking Coffee to Boost Your Metabolism

Are Fitness Trackers Accurate at Counting Calories?

PSA: You May Want to Stop Relying on Your Fitness Tracker For Counting Calories

If you've been using your trusty fitness tracker to count burned calories during a workout, you may want to rethink your ways. Researchers at Stanford University just confirmed our suspicions that these tech devices may not be as accurate as we thought.

A recent study published in the Journal of Personalised Medicine sought to uncover just how effective these wrist-worn trackers are at measuring various metrics, such as heart rate and energy expenditure. Researchers at Stanford University School of Medicine tested seven popular fitness trackers (the Apple Watch, Fitbit Surge, Microsoft Band, Basis Peak, PulseOn, Samsung Gear S2, and Mio Alpha 2) on 60 volunteers, made up of healthy adult men and women, who wore up to four devices at once. For the study, the researchers looked at data from the participants during tests that involved sitting and walking and running on a treadmill and cycling on a stationery bike at low and high intensity.

Once each tracker's data was accumulated, they compared it against data received from medical equipment used by the scientists to measure each participant's heart rate and burned calories. It turns out, the fitness trackers were pretty accurate with their heart rate calculations: six out of the seven trackers tested averaged an error rate of less than five percent. However, all of the trackers failed at measuring calories burned — the most accurate device was off by an average of 27 percent, and the least accurate one was off by a whopping 93 percent. Since each tracker has its own proprietary algorithm to measure energy expenditure, researchers weren't able to explain why the reads were so inaccurate. "My take on this is that it's very hard to train an algorithm that would be accurate across a wide variety of people because energy expenditure is variable based on someone's fitness level, height, and weight, etc.," said Anna Shcherbina, lead author in the study, in a press release from Stanford Medicine.

ADVERTISEMENT

Bottom line: take your fitness tracker's calorie counts with a grain of salt. If you're using that little number to determine other life choices (for example, if you see that you burned 200 calories and are going to indulge in five cookies because of that number), you may want to think again. If tracking your calories burned is important to you, we recommend investing in a chest strap — many which are compatible with popular wrist-worn fitness trackers. In recent studies, chest straps have been shown to have more accurate data when it comes to energy expenditure.

From Our Partners
Being Kind to Yourself While Losing Weight
90-Pound Weight-Loss Story Before and After
How to Lose Weight Without Restrictive Dieting
Weight-Loss Healthy Eating Tip
How Does Weight Loss Affect Your Metabolism?
Reasons You've Hit a Weight-Loss Plateau
Biggest Diets of 2018
Best Wine For Weight Loss
Low-Carb Nuts
What Intermittent Fasting Method Is Best For Beginners?
Bob Harper Diet Tip
How Often to Walk For Weight Loss
From Our Partners
Latest Health & Fitness
All the Latest From Ryan Reynolds