Skip Nav
Reasons to Take Adult Ballet
Workouts
Why You Should Try Adult Ballet Even If You've Never Danced
Why Is a Cough Worse at Night
Cold and Flu
There's a Reason Why Your Cough Feels So Much Worse at Night
Does Lavender Help You Sleep?
editor experiments
I Absolutely Suck at Sleeping, and This Is What Finally Helped Me Rest
Weight Loss
Trying to Boost Your Metabolism? An Expert Says These Are the 4 Things That Actually Work
Slow Cooker Recipes
13 Vegan Slow-Cooker Recipes That Require Minimum Effort For Maximum Taste

Is There Such a Thing as Negative-Calorie Foods?

Is There Such a Thing as a Negative-Calorie Food? A Dietitian Gives Us an Answer


There are some foods that are zero or very few calories: diet soda, cooking oil sprays, shirataki noodles. But what about negative-calorie foods? That is, the idea that your body spends more energy chewing and digesting certain foods that you end up burning off more calories than what they are worth. Some common foods that supposedly fit this bill include cucumbers, celery, mushrooms, and asparagus.

To see if this theory really checks out, we asked a dietitian. Turns out, the idea of taking in calories versus the calories your body burns is a little more nuanced than chalking foods up to having "negative calories."

"Some foods may result in a zero calorie net or a very modest negative calorie net," Rebecca Livingstone, RD, told POPSUGAR. "However, it should be noted that many factors impact the net calories of a food. The negative calorie result would likely only amount to a few calories by the end of the day."

ADVERTISEMENT

She explained that while digesting food costs energy, energy-in versus energy-out is an oversimplification of how digestion and metabolism work. The thermogenic effect of food is the amount of calories that are burned in order to digest the food itself.

"Foods that are higher in fibre and protein tend to require more energy to digest than low-fibre carbs and fats," she said. "So overall the idea that digestion uses energy to digest food is absolutely correct and in some cases may even result in negative calorie net, but it's likely not going to make or break your diet." Considering that one-half cup of cucumber slices is only eight calories and one spear of asparagus is three calories, it would make sense that your body would burn more than that during digestion.

So while the idea of a negative-calorie food is technically correct, it also depends on each person's individual energy expenditure, or the amount of energy a person needs to function, including breathing, digestion, and physical movement. And while you should load up on low-calorie veggies for their fibre, vitamins, and micronutrient content, it's not safe to have a diet that consists primarily of zero or negative-calorie foods. Be sure you're still sticking to your daily calorie budget — usually between 1,500 and 2,000 calories a day.



From Our Partners
Claire Foy Interview About First Man
Can You Boost Your Metabolism?
Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald Interviews 2018
The Scariest Scene in The Haunting of Hill House TV Series
Is Pumpkin Keto?
What Does Acid Reflux Feel Like?
Halloween Fetishes
Breast Cancer Risk Factors
Clean Program Review
Zodiac Signs That Hate Being Alone
Relationship Dealbreakers Based on Your Zodiac Sign
Meghan Markle's Makeup Artist Interview
From Our Partners
Latest Health & Fitness
All the Latest From Ryan Reynolds